Social system
That Social system one seizes over and Social security contributions financed securities for the population together.
Among the social system rank as subsystem u. A. that and those .
Most parts of the today's social systems of Europe became toward end 19. Century imported.
During still assumed, the social system would become more and more redundant with rising prosperity, showed up with that .
neoclassical view of the social system:
There to the maintenance of a social system necessarily, those are according to neoclassical theory too Net welfare losses lead, competes a social system with the prosperity of the public. With a pronounced social system thus none leaves itself . A social system nevertheless seems necessarily, in order to make patients, old persons or work-unable possible getting along.
In consequence a social system makes thus the "prosperity cake smaller", the pieces of cake however approaches in its size on, since the desire decreases to help when baking.
In the last years however always staerkes rising of unemployment left itself by the described in many industrial nations Net welfare losses notice. In the meantime one tries to reach and thus to a "receiver mentality" work against a return to the original idea by a restriction of the social system to really necessary achievements. This pointed itself already to the 1980ern by a change of the social system in Great Britain, later in and in beginnings also in (Hartz IV).
keynesianische view of the social system:
Apart from questions of the distribution justice the welfare state from keynesianischer view plays an important role particularly in three regard. First of all as permanent support of the private consumer demand, secondly as stabilizer in crisis periods and thirdly for the containment of uncertainty. From keynesianischer view no statistically significant negative connection between the development of the welfare state and growth leaves itself empirical and/or. Occupation deduce.
During itself the state State of (portion of the public expenditures of the GROS DOMESTIC PRODUCT) in Germany in the year 2003 on 48% amounted, exhibited Sweden a state ratio of 59%, France of 54%. It is interesting that the economic growth lay annually in Sweden between 1999 and 2004 on average 1.6% over German growth. French growth lay a per cent over the German. Besides exists GROS DOMESTIC PRODUCT and the development of the welfare state in the OECD states a clearly positive correlation between the height.
